|
Post by browncoateric on Apr 10, 2009 6:06:51 GMT -5
I don't think he should have come back because people voted for him to die. I think since they brought him back they should track down everyone that called them and give them a refund with intrest.
|
|
|
Post by jtrain997 on Apr 10, 2009 6:56:04 GMT -5
Its bad enough Rhas didnt stay dead a year but that was an editor descision this was the fans speaking out and now theyve completley ignored the fans choice
|
|
|
Post by agaurdiandevil on Apr 10, 2009 7:45:36 GMT -5
this is why DC annoys me
|
|
|
Post by batmanrip on Apr 10, 2009 7:52:44 GMT -5
The facts/rumors that have gotten out, is that one guy voted over 2000 times in some span of an hour, and DC had said if they had know that, then they would have disqualified the votes. The number of votes was so close that I for one, don't care that they brought him back. Yea, the fans voted him dead, and for a while Jason, Bucky, and Uncle Ben were the characters that you'd never bring back from the dead, because tey helped shape the characters that they were behind. Now that field has changed. Bucky is the new Captain America, and that isn't going to change, Uncle Ben was brought back in some f'd up way, but that was rectified, in another f'd up way, and Jason is back, and he's just f'd up for it. I think it makes an interesting character to the comics, and I think that given the fact that DC knows of this whole factor and the closeness of the votes and the time passed, well, I just don't care.How many comics with a decent fan base get cancelled, there are other things we could add to the mix too.
|
|
|
Post by browncoateric on Apr 10, 2009 12:56:47 GMT -5
Yes because making a character who's whole schtik is responsability to make a deal wiht the devil and say the last 30 years didn't happen is SOOOO much better.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Apr 10, 2009 14:17:12 GMT -5
True you voted him dead but dc never said he was not going to com back. I mean its comics if you really thought he was going to stay dead then I am shocked. Plus they kept him dead for almost 20 years. plus it was almost half and half on the votes, havein him killed barely won.
I don’t see why people dislike Jason Todd. I can see at the time because he was very different from dick and people weren’t ready for a robin like that but on a whole he is a great character. People say he was an asshole but so is batman. They say he never earned the title of robin, well nether than dick. The only one who earned the right was tim.
Then people complains that he kills but so what that’s what is so great about him, he is what batman would be if he killed. And please there are tons of heroes that kill…. Look at wolverine.
Jason is a spiting image of batmans personality and out of the robins is the most like him.
I thought him coming back in hush was well done and under the hood was a great read.
dont get me wrong dick and tim are better robins but Other than dc bringing him back NO ONE has given me a good reason why Jason todd sucks
|
|
42fordprefect
avenger
"We are wrong no matter what right answers there are we are all truly wrong.... im here to correct."
Posts: 544
|
Post by 42fordprefect on Apr 11, 2009 5:30:28 GMT -5
Maybe DC are trying to make Jason evil, I mean he has done horrible things ever since his return from the dead.
|
|
|
Post by batmanrip on Apr 11, 2009 14:59:50 GMT -5
But that's why you have to wonder, can he become Dick's greatest ally or his answer to the Joker.
|
|
|
Post by andrew on Apr 11, 2009 15:32:04 GMT -5
But that's why you have to wonder, can he become Dick's greatest ally or his answer to the Joker. jason doesnt want to kill the joker, he wants bruce to kill him
|
|
|
Post by browncoateric on Apr 11, 2009 18:31:35 GMT -5
No he means when Dick becomes Batman will Jason be his Joker. Which would be AWSOME! but Dan Didio said Battle for the Cowl was Jason's redemption.
|
|
42fordprefect
avenger
"We are wrong no matter what right answers there are we are all truly wrong.... im here to correct."
Posts: 544
|
Post by 42fordprefect on Apr 12, 2009 3:39:37 GMT -5
No he means when Dick becomes Batman will Jason be his Joker. Which would be AWSOME! but Dan Didio said Battle for the Cowl was Jason's redemption. You just said the Joker would be Jason. Oh man, my theory is winning, by the way where is the joker in battle for the cowl.
|
|
|
Post by browncoateric on Apr 12, 2009 7:53:45 GMT -5
Not not literally Joker. He's saying he's be Dick's Joker. MEaning his arch enemy.
|
|
42fordprefect
avenger
"We are wrong no matter what right answers there are we are all truly wrong.... im here to correct."
Posts: 544
|
Post by 42fordprefect on Apr 13, 2009 5:46:02 GMT -5
Not not literally Joker. He's saying he's be Dick's Joker. MEaning his arch enemy. Yeah okay I understand but I just think we need someone out of the Batman Family. In Booster Gold #21 Booster meets the new Batman, they say he's going to kill him.
|
|
|
Post by agaurdiandevil on Apr 13, 2009 8:19:31 GMT -5
Yes because making a character who's whole schtik is responsability to make a deal wiht the devil and say the last 30 years didn't happen is SOOOO much better. i guess your a tad bitter about spidey
|
|
|
Post by browncoateric on Apr 13, 2009 9:00:33 GMT -5
More then a tad.
|
|