|
|
Post by batbruce14 on Oct 1, 2010 5:50:14 GMT -5
One thing I don't understand is when people complain about Tim Burton's Batman films because Batman kills people in them. But the Nolan films have done the exact same thing. In the original Batman movies, he kills the Joker, the Penguin and Two-Face and in the later films Batman kills Ra's al Ghul and Two-Face. When he is battling Ra's al Ghul in Batman Begins he says "I won't kill you, but I don't have to save you." That's like tieing someone up in rope, placing on a train track and saying, "I'm not actually killing you, I'm just setting you up to BE killed." In "the Dark Knight", Batman pushes Two-Face off the building. I've watched that scene a few times and Batman just shoves him off the building. So, in both franchises, Batman kills.
|
|
|
|
Post by ciaranproudfoot on Oct 7, 2010 6:13:18 GMT -5
ya thats how Batman rolls in the movies not like he is in the comics.
|
|
|
|
Post by GarlenGreenGoblin on Oct 14, 2010 21:40:27 GMT -5
Nolan's Batman is different. OK. Here's how, Batman does not Kill Ra's Al Ghul, he leaves him there. Gordon kills Ra's by destroying the monorail, Ra's kill Ra's cause he was the one to stab the controls. Batman clearly says "I'm Not going to kill you. But I DON'T have to save you" In the Dark Knight batman was out of options, he didn't have any Batarangs his grappling gun wasn't going to be quicker than a bullet, plus if Harvey was standing farther away from the edge he probably wouldn't have fallen off. Batman had to break his one rule or else Gordon's son could've died (i say could've because of the coin's chance of hitting heads or tails)
|
|
